Oct 8, 2024
IFPA highlights key organic industry issues in recent NOSB comments
The International Fresh Produce Association (IFPA) recently submitted comments to the National Organic Standards Board (NOSB) in response to its Fall Work Agenda, addressing critical issues impacting the organic fresh produce sector.
These comments, developed with input from IFPA’s Organics Committee, reflect the association’s ongoing commitment to supporting the growth and sustainability of the specialty crop community.
“We appreciate the opportunity to comment and strongly encourage the NOSB to consider the unique challenges faced by fresh produce growers when evaluating regulatory changes,” said Sara L. Neagu-Reed, director of production and environmental policy for IFPA. “Our members rely on a diverse set of tools and inputs, and we must ensure that they have access to these resources to maintain crop viability and long-term success.”
IFPA’s comments covered a wide range of topics, including the following.
Residue testing for a global supply chain
IFPA called for enhanced clarity around laboratory sampling guidelines, urging certifiers to collaborate with accredited labs to ensure reliable testing protocols. The organization emphasized the importance of proper third-party certification and chain of custody to build confidence in residue testing outcomes. IFPA also recommended that certifiers notify growers immediately when residue levels exceed 0.01 ppm, potentially leading to non-compliance.
Consistency in organic seed use
IFPA highlighted that while members are generally able to comply with organic seed regulations, the larger challenge lies in the availability of viable organic seed in the market. The organization advocated for more research and development to increase organic seed quality and availability.
Climate-Induced Farming Risk and Crop Insurance
IFPA emphasized the need for crop insurance options tailored to organic farming risks, recognizing the unique challenges faced by producers. Neagu-Reed stressed that insurance coverages for organic crops should be comparable to those for conventional crops to avoid creating barriers to entry.
Risk-based certification
IFPA voiced concerns about the complexity of implementing risk-based organic certification. The association recommended a more agile approach that balances risk mitigation with reduced audit frequency and improved equity in the certification process.
Other topics addressed included compost production for organic farming and the use of various agricultural inputs such as carbon dioxide, hydrogen peroxide, and horticultural oils.
For more on IFPA’s ongoing advocacy efforts, visit the Organic Policy section of its website.